Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ben Paris's avatar

Are you sure that Lucy Calkins is getting too much blame? She made millions promoting a system that doesn't work, didn't have good data behind it, and doesn't make sense. It's not just that she didn't pay attention to phonics; she actively promoted techniques that don't work. Why would we teach children to guess what a word means based on a picture, for example? Why were we teaching kids to emulate people who fake knowing how to read? And yes, there were plenty of schools and teachers that actively suppressed phonics. My child's school sent parents a letter warning them against teaching children to sound out words, and it wouldn't take much to gather similar stories. She's also slippery when it comes to her defense. No one is claiming that it's not important to build a love of reading. But that love comes from actually reading, which you're not doing if you don't have the tools to understand what the words are.

If anything, there's a case to be made that the damage done to reading instruction has had an underrated role in societal dysfunction. Even a career violent criminal would do less damage to fewer lives than the people who broke reading instruction. If she's still teaching people to guess what the words mean based on the picture, the first letter, and other nonsense, then she deserves all the criticism she's received and more. She may not be the only one with penance to serve, but she belongs in that conversation.

Expand full comment
Jo Candiano's avatar

Helen you piece in the Atlantic about the Dems and identity politics was excellent. It is the reason I subscribed. Wonderful journalism, which is to be expected from you. Congratulations.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts